<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ORM Support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metabates.com/2008/02/27/orm-support/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metabates.com/2008/02/27/orm-support/</link>
	<description>The technical ramblings of Mark Bates.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:45:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bates</title>
		<link>http://www.metabates.com/2008/02/27/orm-support/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mackframework.com/2008/02/27/orm-support/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I admit, I was very surprised as well. I&#039;ve tried a bunch of different tests, doing different things, and they all came out the same.

Here&#039;s an example:

These are from the console, MySQL, pulling back 1000 records:

AR:
running_time do
Post.find(:all)
end
Running time 0.079149 seconds.

DM:
running_time do
Post.find(:all)
end
Running time 0.856797 seconds.

I&#039;m not the only one who came to these conclusions:

http://refactormycode.com/codes/240-datamapper-threaded-benchmark

Notice the comment Sam Smoot left. Seems that there is a bug with 0.2.5 that makes it considerably slower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I admit, I was very surprised as well. I&#8217;ve tried a bunch of different tests, doing different things, and they all came out the same.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an example:</p>
<p>These are from the console, MySQL, pulling back 1000 records:</p>
<p>AR:<br />
running_time do<br />
Post.find(:all)<br />
end<br />
Running time 0.079149 seconds.</p>
<p>DM:<br />
running_time do<br />
Post.find(:all)<br />
end<br />
Running time 0.856797 seconds.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not the only one who came to these conclusions:</p>
<p><a href="http://refactormycode.com/codes/240-datamapper-threaded-benchmark" rel="nofollow">http://refactormycode.com/codes/240-datamapper-threaded-benchmark</a></p>
<p>Notice the comment Sam Smoot left. Seems that there is a bug with 0.2.5 that makes it considerably slower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr eel</title>
		<link>http://www.metabates.com/2008/02/27/orm-support/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr eel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mackframework.com/2008/02/27/orm-support/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m admittedly biased, but datamapper is 10x slower? That is certainly not my experience using the library.

By and large DM is faster. AR still has an edge in some cases, but it&#039;s definitely not 10x faster than DM.

Wonky tests imo :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m admittedly biased, but datamapper is 10x slower? That is certainly not my experience using the library.</p>
<p>By and large DM is faster. AR still has an edge in some cases, but it&#8217;s definitely not 10x faster than DM.</p>
<p>Wonky tests imo <img src='http://www.metabates.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.298 seconds -->

