<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Release 0.8.2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metabates.com/2008/11/30/release-082/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metabates.com/2008/11/30/release-082/</link>
	<description>The technical ramblings of Mark Bates.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:05:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DBA</title>
		<link>http://www.metabates.com/2008/11/30/release-082/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>DBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mackframework.com/?p=206#comment-154</guid>
		<description>Many of Rails components are yet to become thread safe. You see, for the more your core API is thread safe, everything you use inside it, be ir AR, or a lib, must be thread safe as well.

That sure will take a while for a framework that, unlike Mack, was not build with thread safety in mind.

This said, Rails will prolly be thread safe one day or another, for the sake of safety :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of Rails components are yet to become thread safe. You see, for the more your core API is thread safe, everything you use inside it, be ir AR, or a lib, must be thread safe as well.</p>
<p>That sure will take a while for a framework that, unlike Mack, was not build with thread safety in mind.</p>
<p>This said, Rails will prolly be thread safe one day or another, for the sake of safety <img src='http://www.metabates.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Aimonetti</title>
		<link>http://www.metabates.com/2008/11/30/release-082/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Aimonetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mackframework.com/?p=206#comment-153</guid>
		<description>@mark congrats on the release!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mark congrats on the release!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bates</title>
		<link>http://www.metabates.com/2008/11/30/release-082/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mackframework.com/?p=206#comment-152</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the theory. I haven&#039;t tried out AR 2.2 thread safeness yet, but I can vouch for Mack being thread safe. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the theory. I haven&#8217;t tried out AR 2.2 thread safeness yet, but I can vouch for Mack being thread safe. <img src='http://www.metabates.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: libmonac</title>
		<link>http://www.metabates.com/2008/11/30/release-082/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>libmonac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 04:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mackframework.com/?p=206#comment-151</guid>
		<description>I heard that the AR2.2 support ThreadSafe, 
So, with AR thread safe, I can still have all advantages of mack
thread safe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard that the AR2.2 support ThreadSafe,<br />
So, with AR thread safe, I can still have all advantages of mack<br />
thread safe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.265 seconds -->
