<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Meta Bates &#187; sequel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metabates.com/tag/sequel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metabates.com</link>
	<description>The technical ramblings of Mark Bates.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:25:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>ORMs and Mack</title>
		<link>http://www.metabates.com/2008/05/04/orms-and-mack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.metabates.com/2008/05/04/orms-and-mack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 15:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bates</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[active record]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data mapper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[github.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mackframework.com/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So a lot has been made in the last few days about my decision to drop ActiveRecord&#8217;s native support in Mack. People have asked why can&#8217;t I keep what I already have in regards to support for ActiveRecord, and why can&#8217;t I support Sequel. So, I&#8217;ve decided to compromise. In the next version of Mack, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So a lot has been made in the last few days about my decision to drop ActiveRecord&#8217;s native support in <a href="http://www.mackframework.com/2008/05/01/saying-goodbye-to-activerecord/" target="_blank">Mack</a>. People have asked why can&#8217;t I keep what I already have in regards to support for ActiveRecord, and why can&#8217;t I support Sequel. So, I&#8217;ve decided to compromise.</p>
<p>In the next version of Mack, which should be out in the next day or two, I&#8217;ve broken out support for ActiveRecord and DataMapper into their own gems,Â <a href="http://github.com/markbates/mack-orm/tree/master" target="_blank">http://github.com/markbates/mack-orm/tree/master</a>. That means you&#8217;ll be able to still use ActiveRecord, if you want. The default ORM, however, will be DataMapper. That&#8217;s what you&#8217;ll get out of the box with Mack.</p>
<p>Now, keeping with my original post, I&#8217;ll be actively maintaining the mack-data_mapper gem, and when I can I&#8217;ll make similar changes to the mack-active_record, but I&#8217;m not promising anything. Now the good thing here is that since the repos for these gems are on GitHub, anyone can contribute changes/additions to them. I&#8217;ve even put a stub in there for Sequel support, that&#8217;s definitely something someone else will have to support.</p>
<p>This also has a nice advantage in keeping the Mack core clean and simple. Hopefully this will all lead to faster development time turn around for Mack.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also worth noting that when I talk about &#8216;native&#8217; support, all I mean is some Rake tasks and some generators. There&#8217;s nothing stopping anyone from using ANY ORM with Mack. You could even create your own, if you really wanted to.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s to hoping this makes everyone happy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.metabates.com/2008/05/04/orms-and-mack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.888 seconds -->

